T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Huawei Device USA, Inc., 115 F. Supp. 3d 1184 (W.D. Wash. 2015), applied "the stronger form of preemption that the Thola court embraced," predicting that the Washington Supreme Court would adopt that view if presented with the choice. Id. at 1199. The distinction was outcome-determinative: on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the plaintiff's tortious interference claim would have survived under the weak view but did not survive under the strong one, because the complaint contained no allegations permitting proof of tortious interference without relying on the same facts supporting the trade secret claim.